HOME
ENG/HUM 2543
ENG/HUM
2413
ENG/HUM
2433
Supplemental
Readings
Copyright
Kelli McBride 2003-2020
Graphics
designed by Kelli McBride and are for her exclusive use.
Handouts
for college classes maybe used as per fair use practice. All other
documents on this site written by Ms. McBride are copyright protected.
Please email her for rights to use.
............................
|
|
.........................................................................................................................................
|
|
Goal and Objectives
The Goals and Objectives of this unit are as follows:
Build on the argument essay
writing skills covered in Essay 1
Understand the difference between
manipulation and persuasion
Understand the propaganda and
logical fallacies speakers use to win over an audience
Identify when propaganda and
logical fallacies are used.
Explain why the author's words
qualify as propaganda or logical fallacy
Use concepts in one text to
explain another text
Document sources and format
papers in correct MLA style
Resources
Required reading is
indicated by (READ) after titles below.
Assignments
See Cruiser for Deadlines and Due Dates
Read both Donna Woolfolk Cross's "Propaganda: How Not to Be Bamboozled" (in
our Power of Language text) and the LB Brief's section on
"Fallacy" (pp. 113-16). Post a response to
the following questions:
What is propaganda? Give an example that you see
in the world.
What is a logical fallacy? Identify one specific fallacy
(e.g., post hoc ergo propter hoc) then give an example of it that you have
found.
Is it ethical to use either or both when trying to persuade
someone to do something? Why or Why not?
Name a context that would make
this information useful and important to have.
Identify a potential
audience who might need to be informed of or reminded that people use these
techniques to manipulate or persuade us all the time. When done, post a
response to one other classmate's post. Remember also to share your ideas
with your peer group before posting your formal response.
Post a 150-250 word response to Nixon's "Checker's Speech." Read the
text and watch the YouTube 13
minute video of the speech before posting.
How could an audience during
Nixon's speech (given in 1952) have known or suspected he was not being
truthful or straightforward.
Remember, some people heard this on the
radio. There were no VCR, DVR, or DVD recorders, no 24-hour news shows
to breakdown and fact check what Nixon said, no Internet to do it as
well.
Considering the stakes here for Nixon, his political future, what
were the important consequences of so many people falling for his propaganda and logical fallacies?
Over 3 million people contacted the
Republican National Committee in support of Nixon after this speech, and
he remained the vice presidential candidate for the GOP, eventually
winning with Eisenhower. He eventually became president.
What strikes
you as particularly persuasive, outrageous, and funny in this speech?
Respond to one other classmate's post.
.................................................................................................................
|
. |
|
|
|
Sigma Kappa Delta
The Muse
SSC
Home Page
|